Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported that Wellpoint and Blue Shield of California are partnering to create a Health Information Exchange, or HIE.
An HIE is a federally-funded network designed to “allow patients’ records to be shared digitally among the providers caring for them.”
HIE’s already exist in several parts of the country. The Journal article cites an HIE in Indiana in which more than 100 hospitals and 25,000 physicians participate. There is an HIE in my state, Connecticut.
According to the article, the California HIE will - for example - ensure that physicians will have immediate access to patient information in emergencies [which suggests the database is not strictly limited to a patient’s own physicians after all] or ensure that a specialist could review past test results and avoid ordering duplicates.
In general, the theory behind an HIE predicts that when physicians have more complete and readily available patient information, duplication and patient risks decline, and patient outcomes improve. This is a rational prediction based on experience; HIE’s simply bring better technology to bear.
The theory also appears to predict that more effective care will be less costly by much more than enough to offset “user fees” that the HIE charges to its participating providers. HIE’s will test this theory.
And in theory I suppose, the HIE databases will be secure – which is not quite to say unhackable. No doubt this will also be tested.
According to the Journal, the two California insurers “want hospitals, doctors and other insurers around the state to contribute their patients' information as well. In turn, they will be able to draw on records for their patients that were placed in the exchange by other participants.” The Journal further explains what “contribute” means. It means automatically posted - i.e., “Patients' records automatically will be included in the new California network if their health plans or health-care providers join”
However, individuals will be able to “opt out and block their information from being shared.“ [btw, I don’t recall being offered this opt-out in Connecticut].
Also, “Patients initially won't be able to see their own records but should get that ability later, the insurers said.”
So let’s review. These California insurers and providers are bringing up a huge new hackable database of personal health information; the database will automatically contain the information they post for their members/patients; all physicians can readily access the database; but, initially at least, the members/patients won’t be able to see their own records.
Cool. It’s Facebook for Physicians.
UPDATE [HGS]: FoIB David Williams has a related post discussing Patient Portals:
"They’re good for checking lab results, asking non-urgent clinical questions, renewing prescriptions, managing appointment schedules, patient education and paying bills."
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(425)
-
▼
August
(50)
- Insuring Ferguson: Update/Correction
- Cavalcade of Risk #216: Call for submissions
- Healthcare.gov Security Chief Was Distracted
- Obamacare SNAFU - The Gift That Keeps On Giving
- MVNHS© Rocket (but not Cancer) Surgeons
- This Obamacare Winner Will Save $78,420!
- Medical ID Theft Revisited
- And Now a Word From Our Sponsor
- IRS Form 1095-A
- Who Do You Believe
- (Sex) Ch-ch-changes
- Two Timely P&C Notes
- Has Medical Tourism Jumped the Shark?
- Tax Form 1040(OY)
- Carefree, or Free to Care?
- What's Old is New: The AMA, Medicare and Value
- Wednesday Potpourri
- Facebook for Physicians
- Transparency redefined
- Cavalcade of Risk #215 – Dog Days of Summer Editio...
- It's Not Discrimination
- T.R.A.G.I.C. is Back and Still Clueless
- Stupid Congressman Tricks
- Be careful what you wish for...
- Yum!
- Kliff Diving with Sarah
- Authentic 404Care.gov gibberish
- Cavalcade of Risk #215: Call for submissions
- HIV and Medicare, Even if you Aren't HIV Positive
- Health Wonk Review: Dog Days edition
- End of the Line
- Lists and honors
- Artificial Stimulation
- Back on the Oregon Trail
- 30% Sampled Obamacare, Then Said No
- Less for More
- Anthem Update
- Missed it by That Much
- Shortsighted Agency Tricks
- Messy Client Trick
- All aboard the Exemption Train
- Bob G hits the Big Time (Again)
- Are They on Crack?
- Rascally insurance conundrum
- Cavalcade of Risk #214: Bottom Line edition
- Mostly Harmeless Carrier Trick
- No Care For You!
- Trending: Disability stats
- Thanks to Obamacare .............
- Cavalcade of Risk #214: Call for submissions
-
▼
August
(50)
Powered by Blogger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Here's a poser: " Sovaldi, a new pill for hepatitis C, cures the liver-wasting disease in 9 of 10 patients, but treatment can cost ...
-
One of my clients dropped their employer sponsored insurance plan effective May 1, 2014. This forced 21 of their employees (including the ow...
-
Louise Norris hosts next week's edition. Entries are due by Monday (the 27th). To submit your risk-related post, just click here to...
-
A leading Dutch supporter of euthanasia has changed his mind, and speaks out against it, on the occasion of a similar law now being proposed...
-
Ebola. ISIS. Enterovirus. Scary stuff, and sure to get one considering one's own mortality. Not to mention the state of one's life i...
-
Have you received your invitation yet? Perhaps it is lost in the mail. Or you opened it, immediately fainted, and can't remember where y...
-
One of the major problems of the ObamaTax is that it does not, in fact, save health care dollars. This problem plagues similar regimes as we...
-
Have you ever watched someone stack dominoes then tap one and watch the rest fall? Some of these set ups are quite elaborate and took a long...
-
As we posted before, sometimes getting OUT of Obamacare is as difficult as getting in. Well, it get's worse. A fellow agent in the mid...
0 comments:
Post a Comment