Almost four years ago, we wrote about a little known committee, nestled deep in the bowels of the American Medical Association (AMA), that exercised outsized power over how much money doctors will receive in Medicare reimbursements:
"Three times a year, 29 doctors gather around a table in a hotel meeting room. Their job is an unusual one: divvying up billions of Medicare dollars"
As reported at the time in the Wall Street Journal, "the influence of the secretive panel, known as the Relative Value Scale Update Committee, is enormous ... the impact of the decisions made by the doctors on the RUC goes well beyond physician fees"
And indeed, the effects are still incredible: that committee "with the assent of the government, has enormous power to determine Medicare prices by assessing the relative value of the services that physicians perform."
Pretty cozy: the government feeds them, and they divvy up the loot. Nice gig (for them).
But how does that affect thee and me?
Well, it's actually not that complicated: Primary Care docs (representing about 30% of US physicians) are at the bottom of the food chain, even though they are critical frontline actors when it comes to assessing a problem and recommending alternatives. And by "alternatives," we increasingly mean "specialists." And how does that work?
Well:
"[T]he committee has ... skewed Medicare fees in favor of expensive specialists over ordinary general practitioners ... Because Medicare fees are the baseline for the rest of the pricing in the health care system, this has had a broad effect, contributing to a situation where primary care doctors are in general underpaid, underappreciated."
Now , we're not playing the Rich Doctor, Poor Doctor game here, but it's worth noting that the docs who are most involved in our initial care are the ones with the least time at the payment feeding-trough. Here's why: Medicare fees drive (to a significant extent) private insurers' reimbursement schedules. So when that Relative Value committee essentially sets Medicare's fees, they're also effectively setting Anthem's, and Aetna's and Humana's (to name a few). And since most (but not all) docs still accept insurance, the effect is magnified.
It's also worth remembering that the AMA itself represents less than 17% of all US physicians, yet wields this enormous power with little (if any) accountability or oversight. Food for thought.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(425)
-
▼
August
(50)
- Insuring Ferguson: Update/Correction
- Cavalcade of Risk #216: Call for submissions
- Healthcare.gov Security Chief Was Distracted
- Obamacare SNAFU - The Gift That Keeps On Giving
- MVNHS© Rocket (but not Cancer) Surgeons
- This Obamacare Winner Will Save $78,420!
- Medical ID Theft Revisited
- And Now a Word From Our Sponsor
- IRS Form 1095-A
- Who Do You Believe
- (Sex) Ch-ch-changes
- Two Timely P&C Notes
- Has Medical Tourism Jumped the Shark?
- Tax Form 1040(OY)
- Carefree, or Free to Care?
- What's Old is New: The AMA, Medicare and Value
- Wednesday Potpourri
- Facebook for Physicians
- Transparency redefined
- Cavalcade of Risk #215 – Dog Days of Summer Editio...
- It's Not Discrimination
- T.R.A.G.I.C. is Back and Still Clueless
- Stupid Congressman Tricks
- Be careful what you wish for...
- Yum!
- Kliff Diving with Sarah
- Authentic 404Care.gov gibberish
- Cavalcade of Risk #215: Call for submissions
- HIV and Medicare, Even if you Aren't HIV Positive
- Health Wonk Review: Dog Days edition
- End of the Line
- Lists and honors
- Artificial Stimulation
- Back on the Oregon Trail
- 30% Sampled Obamacare, Then Said No
- Less for More
- Anthem Update
- Missed it by That Much
- Shortsighted Agency Tricks
- Messy Client Trick
- All aboard the Exemption Train
- Bob G hits the Big Time (Again)
- Are They on Crack?
- Rascally insurance conundrum
- Cavalcade of Risk #214: Bottom Line edition
- Mostly Harmeless Carrier Trick
- No Care For You!
- Trending: Disability stats
- Thanks to Obamacare .............
- Cavalcade of Risk #214: Call for submissions
-
▼
August
(50)
Powered by Blogger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Here's a poser: " Sovaldi, a new pill for hepatitis C, cures the liver-wasting disease in 9 of 10 patients, but treatment can cost ...
-
One of my clients dropped their employer sponsored insurance plan effective May 1, 2014. This forced 21 of their employees (including the ow...
-
Louise Norris hosts next week's edition. Entries are due by Monday (the 27th). To submit your risk-related post, just click here to...
-
A leading Dutch supporter of euthanasia has changed his mind, and speaks out against it, on the occasion of a similar law now being proposed...
-
Ebola. ISIS. Enterovirus. Scary stuff, and sure to get one considering one's own mortality. Not to mention the state of one's life i...
-
Have you received your invitation yet? Perhaps it is lost in the mail. Or you opened it, immediately fainted, and can't remember where y...
-
One of the major problems of the ObamaTax is that it does not, in fact, save health care dollars. This problem plagues similar regimes as we...
-
Have you ever watched someone stack dominoes then tap one and watch the rest fall? Some of these set ups are quite elaborate and took a long...
-
As we posted before, sometimes getting OUT of Obamacare is as difficult as getting in. Well, it get's worse. A fellow agent in the mid...
0 comments:
Post a Comment